Who will make the really bold move, propose the truly bold
initiatives we need right now to ensure a stabilized economic environment that
will extend at least a decade, not just to the next election cycle? A bold plan would address the long-term
solvency of entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare,
establish reasonable and attainable debt reduction targets, establish a defense
budget that reflects the realities of our role in world events, and establish a
simpler and fairer tax structure that would benefit businesses and citizens
alike. Is this too much to ask?
Mr. Obama already had that opportunity but, when he put the
Simpson-Bowles plan on the shelf, he backed away from the recommendations of
the very commission he empaneled.
Mr. Romney has offered an outline as to how he would tackle
such a task; but he is too busy telling the world how terrible a job Obama had
done.
The simple fact is that no one seems to have a vested
interest in doing the bold things. Quite
the opposite: money in politics is vested in maintaining status quo.
Maybe this is the starting point: campaign finance reform,
reform that really gets the money out of politics. Terms are too short (two years for the
House), and members of Congress have to spend far too much time raising funds
for the next campaign, leaving little time to work on any solutions, bold or
otherwise.
The stability of our economy should be the number one issue
in the campaign. We need to invest in
our nation’s infrastructure, retool our military, and rededicate our commitment
to building our nation’s future on the strength of small businesses, better
education, and a strong middle class.
But the money in play today is pitted against these goals. We will never be able to tackle the bold initiatives until
we get the money out of politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment